And now for a guest post by my colleague David Taylor:
There’s broad consensus from financial markets and economist the RBA will be on hold next week.
As RBC Capital Markets noted, from an RBA perspective, “the PM’s decision to call an election on 3 May is quite neat and likely lends some support to staying on the sidelines following next week’s 31 Mar-1 Apr board meeting.”
“Having cut rates in May and jawboning against market expectations of multiple cuts, the case for a follow up cut next week is not particularly compelling. Inflation is moving in the right direction but the RBA is likely to want confirmation that underlying inflation is firmly back in its target range with the full quarterly CPI due at the end of April.”
“The labour market also still errs tight but the last labour force print has thrown up a little uncertainty and the RBA will want to see more global data and developments to try and gauge the impact and risks to AU from rising global protectionism.
“Staying low during an election campaign is preferable,” chief economist Su-Lin Ong said.
But another investment bank is discounting the democratic process’ influence on monetary policy.
Goldman Sachs economists believe Tuesday’s RBA board meeting will be live.
Economist sat Goldman Sachs believe the April meeting could go either way because the RBA has a propensity to surprise expectations and Australia’s economic fundamentals support the case for further easing.
“Given this macro backdrop and the fact that the RBA’s forecasts are yet to incorporate downside risk from uncertainty on global trade policy, we see a solid case for the RBA to front-load the easing cycle,” Goldman’s chief Australia economist Andrew Boak wrote in a note to clients.
A “solid case”?
That’d be music to the ears of millions of mortgage borrowers.